My one-page issue brief (with links!) on “Facts from Early Childhood Research”

At the request of the group ReadyNation, I prepared a one-page issue brief. This issue brief was designed to provide a brief review of the facts about early childhood programs for business leaders who are involved with ReadyNation.

The one-page issue brief is cut and pasted below. I hope it provides a useful summary. The issue brief includes links to previous posts and websites and articles/books that back up the statements that are made.

The below will fit on one page if you eliminate some of the line spaces and use Calibri 11-point font (and I’m sure other fonts as well, but that’s what I used).

Facts from Early Childhood Research

Returns are large

Large returns confirmed by recent studies of regular state and local agencies operating at large scale

Fade-out: short-term test scores better predictor of long-term earnings than long-term test scores

  • Perry had fade out of test score effects, but 19% earnings boost.
  • Deming : fade in Head Start test scores, but later outcomes predict 11% adult earnings boost.
  • Chetty found that short-term test score effects of kindergarten good predictor of adult earnings effects, but test effects at 3rd grade predict only one-sixth of actual future earnings effects.
  • Why? Importance of hard-to-measure “soft skills”.
  • Some fade-out may reflect controls getting remediation. Remediation savings is benefit of pre-K.

Head Start study

Costs affordable, and eventually self-financing

  • High-quality half-day pre-K is $5K/kid, full-day $9K, full-time child care and pre-K from birth to age 5 is $80K/kid, and parenting programs such as Nurse Family Partnership cost $10K/kid.
  • National costs at full-scale are $15 billion/yr. for  half-day pre-K for all 4-yr- olds, double for full-day or adding age 3.  Full-time child-care/pre-K from birth to age 5 for all disadvantaged kids would cost $40B/yr. NFP for all disadvantaged 1st-time moms costs $4B/yr.
  • Costs are modest per capita. Universal pre-K cost of $15B/yr is $50 per capita.
  • Fiscal benefits from higher tax revenues, lower welfare/special ed/crime costs result in fiscal benefits exceeding costs after 9 to 49 yrs., depending on assumptions.

Pre-K has broad benefits for working class and middle class kids as well as poor

  • Similar $ effects on earnings predicted for both middle-class & poor based on Tulsa/Boston.
  • Why? Quality pre-K hard for middle-class to afford on its own.
  • Targeting still requires big #s: just below half of children less than 5 are below 200% of poverty.

Child-care/parenting program benefits focused on poor kids, but parental benefits may be broader.

  • Why? Middle-class parents may be able to offer/afford such services on their own.
  • Subsidized child-care may have broad benefits for middle-class parents & economy.

State test score trends are consistent with positive benefits of broader access to quality pre-K

About timbartik

Tim Bartik is a senior economist at the Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, a non-profit and non-partisan research organization in Kalamazoo, Michigan. His research specializes in state and local economic development policies and local labor markets.
This entry was posted in Distribution of benefits, Early childhood programs. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to My one-page issue brief (with links!) on “Facts from Early Childhood Research”

  1. Pingback: My one-page issue brief (with links!) on “Facts from Early Childhood Research” by timbartik « St. Joseph County Great Start Collaborative

Comments are closed.