Author Archives: timbartik

Unknown's avatar

About timbartik

Tim Bartik is a senior economist at the Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, a non-profit and non-partisan research organization in Kalamazoo, Michigan. His research specializes in state and local economic development policies and local labor markets.

The national perspective: are business incentives a zero-sum game?

Most of this blog’s posts on business incentives and early childhood programs have taken a state and local perspective. I have focused on whether these policies produce “local economic development benefits”, which are defined as higher per capita earnings for … Continue reading

Posted in Business incentives, National vs. state vs. local | 2 Comments

Interview on public radio

An interview with me (Tim Bartik) about my book Investing in Kids aired this morning (February 14) on Kalamazoo’s public radio station, WMUK. A 5 minute and a 25 minute version of this interview can be found at the news … Continue reading

Posted in Early childhood programs | Comments Off on Interview on public radio

A response to commonly-expressed concerns about preschool

I recently received a request for some information from some early childhood advocates. They were talking to a state legislator in their state. (I leave the state unnamed because I think it doesn’t matter – there are similar debates going … Continue reading

Posted in Early childhood programs | 3 Comments

Metro area growth and business incentives

How might metro area growth affect the economic development benefits of business incentives? This topic is considered in chapter 9 of Investing in Kids. We might expect fast-growing metro areas to be less in need of new jobs.  If an … Continue reading

Posted in Business incentives, Local variation in benefits | 1 Comment

Prevailing metro area growth trends: effects on economic development benefits of early childhood programs

I am exploring in a series of posts how a metro area’s characteristics might alter the economic development benefits of the area’s investments in early childhood programs or business incentives. This is important because we want to see whether these … Continue reading

Posted in Early childhood programs, Local variation in benefits | Comments Off on Prevailing metro area growth trends: effects on economic development benefits of early childhood programs

Political perceptions of pre-k

Sara Mead of Bellwether Education Partners has an interesting blog post at Education Week that focuses on her views on how to overcome the political challenges facing the pre-k movement.  She is reacting to a quote from Joe Klein of … Continue reading

Posted in Distribution of benefits, Early childhood program design issues, Early childhood programs | Comments Off on Political perceptions of pre-k

Metro area size and business incentives

In a previous post, I explored how the economic development benefits of a local area’s investment in early childhood programs might vary with the local area’s population size. In today’s post, I explore how metro area size might affect the … Continue reading

Posted in Business incentives, Local variation in benefits | 1 Comment

Proposed pre-k budget cuts in New Jersey

Steve Barnett of the National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER) has a blog post on recent proposals to cut back New Jersey’s Abbott preschool program from a full-day to a half-day program. This Abbott program, which was prompted by … Continue reading

Posted in Early childhood program design issues, Early childhood programs | Comments Off on Proposed pre-k budget cuts in New Jersey

Metro area size: effects on the economic development benefits of early childhood programs

My book, Investing in Kids, provides evidence that a state or local government’s investment in high-quality early childhood programs will have a payoff for that state or local area. That payoff is what I call “economic development benefits”: higher per … Continue reading

Posted in Early childhood programs, Local variation in benefits | 1 Comment

Does “universal pre-k” need to be a full-day, two-year program?

A commenter on this blog argues that “universal pre-k” is too costly because of the large estimated costs of providing full-day preschool for all 3 year olds and 4 year olds. She argues that “According to UPK advocates, “Universal pre-k” … Continue reading

Posted in Early childhood program design issues, Early childhood programs | 1 Comment